Jacqueline I. Castle

Associate | Los Angeles

More from Jacqueline I. Castle

Image
Image

More from Jacqueline I. Castle

Image
Image

More from Jacqueline I. Castle

Image
Image

jcastle@lozanosmith.com
Tel: 213.929.1066
Fax: 213.929.1077
Vcard   | Bio

Overview

Jacqueline Castle is an associate in Lozano Smith’s Los Angeles office. Ms. Castle represents public agencies in a wide-variety of labor, employment, and litigation matters.

Experience

Ms. Castle was most recently a staff attorney serving as appointed counsel for children who came under the protection of the Juvenile Dependency Court system. She represented clients in Juvenile Dependency proceedings including detention, jurisdiction, disposition, 6-12-18-month review, selection and implementation, and post-permanent review. She handled trials including witness testimony and argument, as well as participated in settlement conferences, and researched dependency case law, statues, and court rules for motions and court proceedings. She is also experienced in conducting independent investigations, interviews, and attending IEP meetings.

Education

Ms. Castle received her Juris Doctor degree from Thomas Jefferson School of Law, where she was named to the Distinguished Honor Roll in the Fall of 2013. She also received a CALI Award in Trial Practice and was awarded First Place Brief at the 2013 National Criminal Procedure Moot Court Competition held at the University of San Diego. She earned her Bachelor of Science degree in Business Law from the University of California, Northridge.

Supreme Court Finds Trademark Disparagement Clause Unconstitutional

By: Michael SmithSloan SimmonsJacqueline Castle-

July 2017 Number 44 The United States Supreme Court has held that trademarks are private speech protected by the First Amendment, even if some find the ideas they express offensive. In Matal v. Tam (2017) 582 U.S. ___, the Court held the Lanham Act's disparagement clause to be unconstitutional because it discriminated based on a viewpoint. The Court, noting that the First Amendment is a bedrock principle of government, wrote that the public expression of ideas may not be prohibited mer...

Supreme Court Strikes Down Denial of Government Grant to Church

By: Michael SmithSloan SimmonsJacqueline Castle-

July 2017 Number 45 The United States Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional a state policy excluding churches from participating in a government benefit program solely based on their religious status. This is a reminder that public agencies cannot deny religious institutions participation in government programs designed to promote a public benefit solely because of the institution's religious character. (Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Carol S. Comer (2017) 582 U.S. _...