Meera H. Bhatt

Associate | Fresno

More from Meera H. Bhatt

Image
Image

More from Meera H. Bhatt

Image
Image

More from Meera H. Bhatt

Image
Image

mbhatt@lozanosmith.com
Tel: 559.431.5600
Fax: 559.261.9366
Vcard   | Bio

Overview
Meera H. Bhatt is an Associate in Lozano Smith's Fresno office. Ms. Bhatt is a member of the firm's Labor and Employment Practice Group. Ms. Bhatt advises clients regarding a wide-range of issues affecting public agencies related to labor and employment.

Experience
Ms. Bhatt has represented employers in state and federal courts, arbitrations, mediations, and in wide spectrum of administrative proceedings, including before agencies such as the DFEH, EEOC, DIR, Cal OSHA, Workers Compensation Appeals Board, Agricultural Labor Relations Board, and National Labor Relations Board. She has also represented clients at trial and successfully defended employers against alleged violations of FEHA, ADA, ADEA, FLSA, wrongful termination, wage and hour, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims. She has experience advising employers regarding collective bargaining obligations, strike activity, investigations, disciplinary hearings, use of performance evaluations, and termination. Ms. Bhatt prides herself on her responsiveness and accessibility to clients.

Presenter Experience
Ms. Bhatt has regularly provided presentations and training to employers in a variety of labor and employment matters, including investigation into discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, sexual harassment, sick leave, and wage and hour issues. Ms. Bhatt is a long term member of Toastmasters, an international public speaking and leadership organization and has served two terms on the Executive Board.

Education
Ms. Bhatt obtained her Juris Doctor degree from the University of California, Davis School of Law where she earned the King Hall Pro Bono Award and the U.C. Davis Public Interest Law Certificate. She graduated magna cum laude from the University of California, Los Angeles with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology.

PERB Decision Provides Guidance Addressing “Public Hearing” Requirement

By: Jenell Van BindsbergenMeera Bhatt-

March 2019Number 17 In a recent decision, the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) addressed the public hearing requirement an agency must satisfy before implementing its last, best, and final offer (LBFO), after completing applicable impasse procedures. In City of Yuba City (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2603-M, PERB upheld an administrative law judge decision dismissing an unfair practice charge brought against the City of Yuba City (City) by Public Employees Union Local 1 (Local 1) alleging viol...

Mayor-Sponsored Pension Reform Ballot Measure Triggered Meet and Confer Requirement, Court Rules

By: Jenell Van BindsbergenMeera Bhatt-

August 2018Number 43When a public official with responsibility for labor relations sponsors a ballot measure affecting workers' terms and conditions of employment, the duty to meet and confer arises, the California Supreme Court recently ruled. (Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board)BackgroundIn 2010, San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders developed a citizen's initiative to eliminate traditional pensions for new hires. Sanders told the press that his purpose for pursuing pension reform through ...

Overturning Longstanding Precedent, Supreme Court Rules that Non-Union Members Cannot Be Required to Pay Agency Fees

By: Regina GarzaMeera Bhatt-

This news brief is intended for municipalities and special districts. For the Janus news brief intended for public school districts, including community colleges, click here.June 2018Number 28In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court has held that non-union public employees may no longer be required to pay mandatory agency fees on the grounds that such fees violate the First Amendment. In so holding, Janus v. AFSCME reverses 40 years of legal precedent. Janus may be one of the most...

Ninth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment, Finding Employer's Response to Discrimination and Harassment Complaints Inadequate

By: Sloan SimmonsMeera Bhatt-

April 2017 Number 16 In Reynaga v. Roseburg Forest Products (9th Cir. 2017) 847 F.3d 678, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently delivered an important opinion regarding public entity employers and what is required for an appropriate response to an employee's complaint of harassment or hostile work environment. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit emphasized that employer liability may exist for negligence, if the employer fails to take effective remedial action in response to such an empl...

Ninth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment, Finding Employer's Response to Discrimination and Harassment Complaints Inadequate

By: Sloan SimmonsMeera Bhatt-

April 2017 Number 16 In Reynaga v. Roseburg Forest Products (9th Cir. 2017) 847 F.3d 678, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently delivered an important opinion regarding public entity employers and what is required for an appropriate response to an employee's complaint of harassment or hostile work environment. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit emphasized that employer liability may exist for negligence, if the employer fails to take effective remedial action in response to such an employe...