Proposition 64: Legal and Practical Considerations

December 2016
Number 87
On November 8, 2016, California voters passed the "Control, Regulation and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act" ("Prop. 64"), legalizing recreational marijuana use for those 21 years old and older. The new law, effective immediately, among many other provisions does the following related to marijuana:
The impact of federal law on enforcement of Prop. 64 is uncertain. Marijuana continues to be a Class 1 narcotic under the federal Controlled Substances Act, but the U.S. Department of Justice indicated in a 2013 memorandum that it would defer enforcement for marijuana violations to states that had established "strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems." It is uncertain whether the Department of Justice's current practice will remain in effect or be altered when a new presidential administration takes office in January.
The passage of Prop. 64 raises many issues for public agencies responsible for school and child safety, public health and safety, law enforcement, and for maintaining safe and drug-free workplaces. These issues include, but are not limited to:
Number 87
On November 8, 2016, California voters passed the "Control, Regulation and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act" ("Prop. 64"), legalizing recreational marijuana use for those 21 years old and older. The new law, effective immediately, among many other provisions does the following related to marijuana:
- Establishes a regulatory scheme for cultivation, distribution, sale, testing and use;
- Allows for personal cultivation of up to six plants inside a private home;
- Prohibits public use;
- Prohibits all use in vehicles and maintains existing laws about driving while impaired;
- Prohibits use within 1,000 feet of a school, day care center or youth center (unless it is in a private residence within that radius and the smoke cannot be detected at the school or center);
- Allows cities and counties significant local control over regulation related to sale, manufacturing, production, cultivation and related businesses, including the authority to ban certain activities within the agency's jurisdiction;
- Allows public and private employers to prohibit use, possession, purchasing, transporting, obtaining or giving away marijuana on their premises and to establish and enforce drug- and alcohol-free workplace policies;
- Imposes penalties for public use, use in prohibited school or tobacco-free zones or for having an open container; and
- Provides for drug prevention education and community service for offenders younger than 18 years.
The impact of federal law on enforcement of Prop. 64 is uncertain. Marijuana continues to be a Class 1 narcotic under the federal Controlled Substances Act, but the U.S. Department of Justice indicated in a 2013 memorandum that it would defer enforcement for marijuana violations to states that had established "strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems." It is uncertain whether the Department of Justice's current practice will remain in effect or be altered when a new presidential administration takes office in January.
The passage of Prop. 64 raises many issues for public agencies responsible for school and child safety, public health and safety, law enforcement, and for maintaining safe and drug-free workplaces. These issues include, but are not limited to:
- Employees possessing, using or sharing marijuana in or near the workplace;
- Establishing a defensible drug-free workplace policy, including a drug-testing protocol; and
- Dealing with employees and/or students who are suspected of being under the influence.
As the information contained herein is necessarily general, its application to a particular set of facts and circumstances may vary. For this reason, this News Brief does not constitute legal advice. We recommend that you consult with your counsel prior to acting on the information contained herein.