Page 37 - 2026 Lozano Smith Brown Act Handbook
P. 37

(1) A general explanation of the legislative public meeting process.

                       (2) An explanation of the procedures for a member of the public to provide in-person or
               remote oral public comment during a public meeting or to submit written public comment.

                       (3) A calendar of all public meeting dates with calendar listings that include the date,
               time, and location of each public meeting.

                       (4) The agenda posted online.

                              Such local agencies must make reasonable efforts to invite groups that do not
               traditionally participate in public meetings to attend those meetings. Local agencies have broad
               discretion in the choice of reasonable efforts they make, and the agency may not be sued from
               failing to provide public meeting information to any specific group.

                              Suggested groups to notify are: media organizations that provide news coverage
               in the agency’s  jurisdiction, including media organizations that serve non-English-speaking
               communities; and good government, civil rights, civic engagement, neighborhood, and
               community group organizations that are active in the agency’s jurisdiction, including
               organizations active in non-English-speaking communities.

               (Government Code § 54953(b)(3).)

                       6.     The Legislative Body May Not Prohibit Public Criticism.

                              The legislative body may not prohibit the public from criticizing the “policies,
               procedures, programs, or services of the agency, or of the acts or omissions of the legislative
               body” regardless of whether it implicates the performance of one or more of its employees.

               (Government Code § 54954.3(c); Perry Educational Association v. Perry Local Educators
               Association (1983) 460 U.S. 37, 60; Leventhal v. Vista Unified School District (1997) 973
               F.Supp. 951; Baca v. Moreno Valley Unified School District (1996) 936 F.Supp. 719; Ribakoff v.
               City of Long Beach (2018) 27 Cal.App.5th 150; 90 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 47 (2007).)

                       7.     Members of the Public Cannot be Required to Give Names or Sign a Register as a
                              Condition of Attendance.

                              Members of the public cannot be compelled to provide their name or sign a
               register as a condition of attendance at a meeting, unless required by a third-party internet
               provider for remote participation.  If a register is provided, it must state clearly that signing the
               register is voluntary and that all persons may attend the meeting regardless.  While it is unclear
               whether attendance also means participation, it is recommended that providing a name or address
               not be mandated to speak unless providing that information is directly relevant to the item being
               discussed.  Even under those circumstances, if a member of the public wishes to speak
               anonymously, the legislative body should consider allowing them to speak, but otherwise give
               the weight or credibility that such anonymous comments are due.
               (Government Code § 54953.3.)



      2026 Brown Act Handbook                                                                      LozanoSmith.com   25
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42