Page 2 - TIPJar Summer 2017
P. 2

Editor’s Note:








               The Aftermath of City of San Jose






               BY PENELOPE R. GLOVER

                        hen WikiLeaks   confirmed the applica-  law’s affirmation of   your data—and discuss a
                        published      tion of the California   these responsibilities, it   related records reten-
               Wmore than              Public Records Act      is now more important   tion topic, litigation
               20,000 leaked Demo-     to communications       than ever that public   holds.
               cratic National Commit-  made from or stored on   agencies recognize the
               tee emails in the heat   personal devices and   obligations they have to   If you’d like more infor-
               of the 2016 presiden-   in personal accounts,   educate their officials   mation on the City of San
               tial election, political   foisting an untested set   and employees on their   Jose decision or any oth-
               journalist Olivia Nuzzi   of responsibilities onto   policies and procedures   er technology-related
               famously tweeted that   public agencies and the   in order to better meet   legal issue you’re facing,
               one should “Dance like   people who serve them.    their evolving legal obli-  feel free to get in touch
               no one is watching; email                       gations.                with an attorney in our
               like it may one day be   Now, there is no doubt                         Technology & Innovation
               read aloud in a deposi-  that individual public   In this issue of the TIP   Practice Group at one of
               tion.”                  agency employees are    Jar, we explain City of   our eight offices located
                                       responsible for retaining   San Jose’s big takeaways,   statewide.  And if you’ve
               Nuzzi’s adage has long   agency-related emails   guide public agencies   got questions or sugges-
               been true for public    and texts sent to or from   through California’s   tions for the TIP Jar, feel
               agency officials and    their personal devices   aging records retention   free to get in touch. 
               employees, whose work   and accounts.  They     laws, and talk tech tools
               communications are gen-  are also responsible for   for retaining commu-  Penelope R. Glover is Senior
               erally a matter of public   searching or consent-  nications between    Counsel in Lozano Smith’s
               record.  But the Cali-  ing to a search of their   folks like teachers and   Walnut Creek office and
               fornia Supreme Court’s   devices and accounts for   students.  We also pro-  chair of the firm’s Technol-
               recent decision in City of   responsive records re-  vide real-world, expert   ogy & Innovation Practice
               San Jose v. Superior Court   quested under the Public  guidance on spotting   Group.
               (2017) 2 Cal.5th 608    Records Act.  With the   metadata—data about




























               TIPJar - Summer 2017    2
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7